I took the test last Saturday and I think it went well. We were given a set of case studies a couple of days before the exam and told that these were worth 60% and that we only needed 40% to pass. We couldn't take the case studies in with us but we had the time to study them and then were handed a fresh copy in the exam. They were fairly straight forward such as:
A boy is continually disrupting the lesson and after several attempts at getting him 'on task' you threaten him with detention. He gets very upset and says you are picking on him. He then tries to leave the classroom. You put your arm out to stop him.
We then had to briefly write about the legal issues and how the legal framework might be applied. There were abut six of these.
The second part was made up of fairly simple tick box questions like:
a parent being inconvenienced by a detention is a fair reason not to give a pupil one
Then there were some asking for definitions,
'in loco parentis'
and then there were some wanting examples of things, for example:
Give three things which might appear in a home school agreement OR
Name three situations when you are justified to use the minimum necessary physical force with a child
We had about an hour an a quarter and it wasn't difficult.
That said, we haven't got our marks back yet so I'll let you know!