Posted 24 October 2009 - 07:26 PM
This is a fairly easy essay in some ways.
You need to start your research simply by making a list of the reforms, and then working out how they improved people's lives.
The question, however, does not simply ask you how the reforms improved people's lives.
It asks you 'to what extent' (= 'how far').
I suppose the key question here, of course, is 'compared to what?'
And that is the key to answering it.
Compared to the welfare-less state before the reforms, they represented a HUGE improvement.
Compared to our cradle-to-grave Welfare State, however, perhaps they left a lot to be desired?
Structure of the essay?
I can see two ways through the data:
ONE:
Go through each reform in turn, comparing it to what had been, then comparing it to the situation today, making a judgement reform by reform, and then sum up in a conclusion-of-conclusions.
TWO:
In your first half, talk about the reforms as a whole, comparing them to what was and stressing the benefits.
In a second section, compare them as a whole to the situation today, stressing the shortfall.
Weigh the situation for versus against in a conclusion.
Introduction
You asked specifically about the introduction.
The general wisdom says that you need to summarise the approach you are going to adopt in your essay.
Perhaps also outline how the enthusiasm with which the public received the reforms at the time.
But my advice always is to keep your introduction as short as possible, and get into the 'meat' of your essay as soon as possible.
Historiography
Remember at this level you MUST refer to what other historians have said about this matter - at least in your conclusion.
You will find this out from your textbooks and internet research. If necessary, index-read a load of books/google-search the internet to get some different statements.
I strongly advise you to ditch the various offered 'exemplar' essays on the net; they are simply the efforts of other students and many of them are rubbish.